• Deccan Chronicle
  • Andhra Bhoomi
  • Asian Age
  • ePaper
  •  Auto Refresh
Home

ePaper
Last Updated:07:14 PM IST | Tuesday, Mar 21, 2023
  • Home
  • Politics, Plan And Policy
  • Markets
  • Companies
  • Economy
  • In Other News
  • Autos
  • Just In
Menu
  • Home
  • Politics, Plan And Policy
  • Markets
  • Companies
  • Economy
  • In Other News
  • Autos
  • Just In
Home > Companies > Karnataka High Court stays insolvency move against Flipkart
Companies
Karnataka High Court stays insolvency move against Flipkart
Sangeetha G
By  
  , Published : Nov 7, 2019, 1:32 am IST | Updated : Nov 7, 2019, 1:32 am IST

The NCLT accepted the petition filed by Mumbai-based CloudWalker Streaming Technologies, an LED TV supplier to Flipkart.

Flipkart opposed the petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, contending that it is a profit-making company with sufficient financial strength. It also contended that CloudWalker has failed to produce Purchase Orders or invoices to support the claim.
Flipkart opposed the petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, contending that it is a profit-making company with sufficient financial strength. It also contended that CloudWalker has failed to produce Purchase Orders or invoices to support the claim.

Chennai: The National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru has initiated insolvency proceedings against Flip-kart for making a default of Rs 18 crore to a supplier. However, Flipkart said the Karnataka High Court has stayed the NCLT order.

The NCLT accepted the petition filed by Mumbai-based CloudWalker Streaming Technologies, an LED TV supplier to Flipkart. As per the petition, Flipkart has paid only Rs 85 crore against dues of Rs 103 crore.

Under an agreement entered by both the parties in December 2016, Cloud-Walker has been importing and supplying LED TVs to Flipkart but the latter allegedly failed to collect all the TVs for which orders were placed, failed to pay excess charges and costs as promised and failed to honour the commitment.  The e-commerce company also coerced the company offer discounts on the TVs. By March 2018, Flipkart had failed to collect 70 per cent of the goods ordered by them.

Flipkart opposed the petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, contending that it is a profit-making company with sufficient financial strength. It also contended that CloudWalker has failed to produce Purchase Orders or invoices to support the claim. Flipkart maintained that instead of finalising the disputed amounts, CloudWalker has filed Instant Company Petition on untenable grounds.

end-of
Tags: 
national company law tribunal, flipkart
Location: 
India, Tamil Nadu, Chennai (Madras)
Latest From Companies
HUL CMD Sanjiv Mehta said the results show that the long-term structural opportunity of FMCG in India remains intact.

HUL Q1 net profit rises 5.7 pc to Rs 1,897 crore

The management of Radar has built and exited 3 different businesses themselves which helps the sensitise first time and even veteran entrepreneurs.

Radar India advisors scales a new high

The top seven cities of Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai, Hyderabad, Pune and Bengaluru accounted for 4.45 billion km.

Delhi sees more night trips than Bengaluru, Mumbai, says Ola

Most Popular

Mukesh Ambani 9th richest on Forbes' real-time billionaires list
Top credit card myths harmful for your financial well-being
Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella tops Fortune's Businessperson of the Year 2019
Employment growth slowed down in last two years: report
GST structure: key challenges and its solutions

Editor's Picks

Income tax e-filers drop by over 6.6 lakh in FY19: Official data
Swiping on your smartphone reveals a lot about you to your social media company
  • Read Financial Chronicle as it appears in print.
  • Subscribe, and get it delivered in the inbox everyday.
  • Politics, Plan And Policy
  • Markets
  • Companies
  • Economy
  • In Other News
  • Autos
  • Just In
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Guidelines
  • Copyright © 2019 Financial Chronicle, All rights reserved
Developed & Maintained By Daksham